<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Things Jim Rogers &#187; jim rogers sugar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/tag/jim-rogers-sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com</link>
	<description>An unauthorized Jim Rogers blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers October 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim rogers sugar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Index Universe: Jim Rogers Interview: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds No surprise to those who have been following Jim Rogers for the past year or so. Jim Rogers continues to be bullish on Sugar despite making multi-year highs but not all time highs. Jim Rogers has also stated recently that for the first [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/13/jim-rogers-bullish-on-commodities-not-stocks-time/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jim Rogers Bullish On Commodities, Not Stocks- Time'>Jim Rogers Bullish On Commodities, Not Stocks- Time</a> <small>Jim Rogers&#8217; daughters may not have been born with silver...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/16/jim-rogers-on-korea/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jim Rogers On Korea'>Jim Rogers On Korea</a> <small>Singapore, China, Sri Lanka, etc.. are all Asian countries which...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: <a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">Index Universe: Jim Rogers Interview: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds</a></p>
<p>No surprise to those who have been following Jim Rogers for the past year or so. Jim Rogers continues to be bullish on Sugar despite making multi-year highs but not all time highs. Jim Rogers has also stated recently that for the first time in a long time he has no shorts, this could be changing shortly.</p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>IndexUniverse.com (IU.com): How do you think the specter of increased regulation will affect futures-based index commodities ETFs?</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>Jim Rogers (Rogers): </strong>First of all, there’s no question: It’s not just a specter—they seem to have it in their heads that they’ve got to do something. It’s interesting because index investing doesn’t really have much effect on the price. Index investors don’t take delivery of commodities—they turn around and sell them again. Index investors in stocks, now they do have influence on the market, because they take stocks off the market. Anybody who invests in the S&amp;P 500 funds, they buy stocks and take them off the market. If anybody manipulates the market, it’s the stock index investors. Having said that [the regulators] look like they’re going to do something.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">It is having a temporary effect on the market, but eventually it’s going to drive the markets offshore. America has had a near-monopoly on commodity trading for 100 years, and they’re just giving it to the rest of the world. I live in Asia, and I travel a lot. [They] can’t believe what they’re seeing because America’s about to say, “Here. Take the business.”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">Many countries have made mistakes like this. If it happens, there’s going to be a temporary blip in the market. It will make the fundamentals of commodities better because as long as prices are down, there’s less incentive for people to produce more. But eventually you’re going to see [business move to other] markets, whether it’s in Japan, Singapore or India. They’re all sitting there dumbfounded that this is happening.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">If you’ll notice, the English have said “well, we’re not going to do this.” Because they love the fact that all of a sudden they may get a lot of business that will be forced out of the U.S. and into other markets. It’s staggering.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">But then I’ve often been staggered by politicians throughout my life, and if you read back in history, you sometimes say to yourself, “How can anyone be so dumb?”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>IU.com: Has the persistent contango in certain commodities counteracted the argument for index-based commodities investment?</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>Rogers</strong><strong>: </strong>I do notice the press has suddenly learned how to spell “contango,” and even “commodities.”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">I’ve seen it come and go. Certainly when you deal in a commodity that is in contango, it makes it more difficult. However, if a commodity is in contango and the basic price is going through the roof, you’re still going to make a lot of money. But I’ve seen contango come and go. From my point of view, as a passive investor, I really don’t pay attention because there’s usually something in backwardation and something else in contango, and they come and go over time. According to studies, they haven’t had that much difference.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"> But if you’re really smart and you can invest away from contango or can invest with contango and know how to do it, you’ll make a lot more money. And there are people who think they are really smart and are trying to do that right now. I’m not smart enough to do it, so I just continue to invest in an indexed way with all commodities</a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/13/jim-rogers-bullish-on-commodities-not-stocks-time/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jim Rogers Bullish On Commodities, Not Stocks- Time'>Jim Rogers Bullish On Commodities, Not Stocks- Time</a> <small>Jim Rogers&#8217; daughters may not have been born with silver...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/16/jim-rogers-on-korea/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jim Rogers On Korea'>Jim Rogers On Korea</a> <small>Singapore, China, Sri Lanka, etc.. are all Asian countries which...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Rogers On Gold</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/08/jim-rogers-on-gold/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/08/jim-rogers-on-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim rogers bloomberg october 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim rogers gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim rogers sugar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing with his appearance with the media, Jim Rogers appeared on Gold. While most blogs and the media will focus on the $2000 price target, its important to emphasize the time frame, which is in the next decade. One thing I have noticed over the past couple of weeks, Jim Rogers is getting a couple [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with his appearance with the media, Jim Rogers appeared on Gold. While most blogs and the media will focus on the $2000 price target, its important to emphasize the time frame, which is in the next decade. One thing I have noticed over the past couple of weeks, Jim Rogers is getting a couple more questions thrown his way on Sugar, which is hitting decade long high, but not all time highs.</p>
<p>“I own some cotton,” Rogers said. “I own some sugar,” he said. “Sugar will go much, much higher over the course of the bull market.”</p>
<p>“Oil could reach between $150 and $200 a barrel,” because known reserves of crude are declining, Rogers said. He said international relations, particularly between the U.S. and Iran, will help guide prices.</p>
<p>“Natural gas is very cheap,” he said in the interview between sessions at an ETF Securities Ltd. investor conference.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u_eeWJIijoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u_eeWJIijoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/08/jim-rogers-on-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
