<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Things Jim Rogers &#187; Jim Rogers bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/tag/jim-rogers-bonds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com</link>
	<description>An unauthorized Jim Rogers blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers October 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim rogers sugar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Index Universe: Jim Rogers Interview: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds No surprise to those who have been following Jim Rogers for the past year or so. Jim Rogers continues to be bullish on Sugar despite making multi-year highs but not all time highs. Jim Rogers has also stated recently that for the first [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: <a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">Index Universe: Jim Rogers Interview: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds</a></p>
<p>No surprise to those who have been following Jim Rogers for the past year or so. Jim Rogers continues to be bullish on Sugar despite making multi-year highs but not all time highs. Jim Rogers has also stated recently that for the first time in a long time he has no shorts, this could be changing shortly.</p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>IndexUniverse.com (IU.com): How do you think the specter of increased regulation will affect futures-based index commodities ETFs?</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>Jim Rogers (Rogers): </strong>First of all, there’s no question: It’s not just a specter—they seem to have it in their heads that they’ve got to do something. It’s interesting because index investing doesn’t really have much effect on the price. Index investors don’t take delivery of commodities—they turn around and sell them again. Index investors in stocks, now they do have influence on the market, because they take stocks off the market. Anybody who invests in the S&amp;P 500 funds, they buy stocks and take them off the market. If anybody manipulates the market, it’s the stock index investors. Having said that [the regulators] look like they’re going to do something.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">It is having a temporary effect on the market, but eventually it’s going to drive the markets offshore. America has had a near-monopoly on commodity trading for 100 years, and they’re just giving it to the rest of the world. I live in Asia, and I travel a lot. [They] can’t believe what they’re seeing because America’s about to say, “Here. Take the business.”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">Many countries have made mistakes like this. If it happens, there’s going to be a temporary blip in the market. It will make the fundamentals of commodities better because as long as prices are down, there’s less incentive for people to produce more. But eventually you’re going to see [business move to other] markets, whether it’s in Japan, Singapore or India. They’re all sitting there dumbfounded that this is happening.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">If you’ll notice, the English have said “well, we’re not going to do this.” Because they love the fact that all of a sudden they may get a lot of business that will be forced out of the U.S. and into other markets. It’s staggering.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">But then I’ve often been staggered by politicians throughout my life, and if you read back in history, you sometimes say to yourself, “How can anyone be so dumb?”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>IU.com: Has the persistent contango in certain commodities counteracted the argument for index-based commodities investment?</strong></a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"><strong>Rogers</strong><strong>: </strong>I do notice the press has suddenly learned how to spell “contango,” and even “commodities.”</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank">I’ve seen it come and go. Certainly when you deal in a commodity that is in contango, it makes it more difficult. However, if a commodity is in contango and the basic price is going through the roof, you’re still going to make a lot of money. But I’ve seen contango come and go. From my point of view, as a passive investor, I really don’t pay attention because there’s usually something in backwardation and something else in contango, and they come and go over time. According to studies, they haven’t had that much difference.</a></p>
<p><a title="Jim Rogers Long Sugar, Short Bonds" href="http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/features/6742-jim-rogers-long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds.html?Itemid=5" target="_blank"> But if you’re really smart and you can invest away from contango or can invest with contango and know how to do it, you’ll make a lot more money. And there are people who think they are really smart and are trying to do that right now. I’m not smart enough to do it, so I just continue to invest in an indexed way with all commodities</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2009/10/21/long-sugar-but-getting-short-bonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonds will be a terrible investment-Jim Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2008/11/12/bonds-will-be-a-terrible-investment-jim-rogers/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2008/11/12/bonds-will-be-a-terrible-investment-jim-rogers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Rogers bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Bottom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Bonds are going to be a terrible place to be for the next 10, 20 years&#8221;-Jim Rogers Jim Rogers reiterates that stocks are still expensive on a historical valuation basis in a conference in Seoul. Jim Rogers also believe stocks will be in a in a trading range &#8220;for years to come.&#8221; Have we hit [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bonds are going to be a terrible place to be for the next 10, 20 years&#8221;-Jim Rogers</p>
<p>Jim Rogers reiterates that stocks are still expensive on a historical valuation basis in a conference in Seoul. Jim Rogers also believe stocks will be in a in a trading range &#8220;for years to come.&#8221;<span id="more-71"></span></p>
<p><strong>Have we hit bottom&#8230;.?</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I have started going back into the markets; that does not means it&#8217;s the bottom&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We may be hitting &#8216;a&#8217; bottom&#8221; Rogers said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s `the&#8217; bottom.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>What ahs he been buying since mid-October?</strong></p>
<p>Commodities and equities in China and Taiwan, as well as &#8220;a Korea stock&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Rogers continues to like commodities over stocks as their fundamentals are &#8220;unimpaired&#8221;&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;You will see that stocks have gone down more so far than commodities. That will continue as far as I&#8217;m concerned.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Source</em>: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aXD.ktb8insw" target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aXD.ktb8insw</a></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allthingsjimrogers.com/2008/11/12/bonds-will-be-a-terrible-investment-jim-rogers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

